11 May 2009 - Issue : 833
Read more: http://www.neurope.eu/articles/94168.php#ixzz0b0C3uJ4h
Hungary’s largest gas distribution company, EMFESZ, has been “fraudulently” sold to the mysterious Swiss-based firm RosGas AG without the consent of its owner, Ukrainian gas billionaire Dmitry Firtash, Robert Shetler-Jones, chief executive of Group DF that holds Firtash’s business assets, told New Europe telephonically on May 8, adding that DF would fight to get EMFESZ back. “We at Group DF and Mr. Firtash have sold nothing. What has happened is that our Managing Director, Mr (Istvan) Goczi has fraudulently transferred the shares in EMFESZ to RosGas without our approval and without our consent,” Shetler-Jones claimed. He said that the sale raises new concerns about Europe’s gas security since the future EMFESZ, Hungary’s largest independent supplier of gas, remains uncertain. “We do not know who is behind RosGas and therefore we don’t know who is looking to supply EMFESZ with gas,” Shetler-Jones said, adding that he doesn’t understand how RosGas can secure supplies of gas to provide to EMFESZ. Little is known about RosGas, the Swiss company which was recently created in Zug. Shetler-Jones claimed that RosGas has a few directors, one of whom is an officer who is directly responsible to Goczi, the managing director of EMFESZ. “We do not know who owns RosGas, we do not know on what basis they have persuaded Mr. Goczi to carry out this fraudulent operation,” he said.
Read more: http://www.neurope.eu/articles/94168.php#ixzz0b0C7PKvj
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution Non-Commercial
Shetler-Jones stressed that there has not been a decision of the board of directors to sell EMFESZ to RosGas. “Mr Goczi, what he seems to be saying is that he is using a power of attorney for this so-called ‘sale.’ The power of attorney he is supposedly using is one dating from 2004 that was issued to him to initially buy the shares in EMFESZ on behalf of Mr. Firtash. He somehow managed to persuade the Hungarian authorities that this power of attorney gives him the authority also to sell the shares onto a third party,” Shetler-Jones claimed. “However, this does not, in our view, give him the right; it is certainly not done with our approval and therefore we will be pursuing all legal means in our path to get this asset back to our control,” he told New Europe, adding that Group DF will “most certainly” seek criminal charges against Goczi and his associates.
The dispute over the ownership of EMFESZ comes weeks after Firtash was muscled out of the Ukrainian gas trade under the terms of a new Russian-Ukrainian contract agreed by his nemesis Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko and Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin after the January gas supply crisis. Under the new contract, Russian gas monopoly Gazprom will supply Ukraine directly, cutting out the middleman – RosUkrEnergo. Firtash owns 45 percent of Swiss-registered RosUkrEnergo, where he is a partner with Gazprom, which holds another 50 percent of the trader. EMFESZ announced two weeks it was switching its gas purchases from Rosukrenergo to RosGas. Asked about the switch, Shetler-Jones said, “As far as I’m aware RosGas is not supplying gas to EMFESZ. One of the issues that concerned us was the very statement that EMFESZ made about securing supplies of gas from RosGas ... Group DF was not aware of those negotiations and, of course, we do not know what Rosgas is, so I’m assuming that is all part of the process that we now seeing unwinding, the transfer of shares, the sourcing of different supplies of gas and who is behind it is fundamental to understanding what has happened.” In a statement, EMFESZ said that RosGas is part of Gazprom’s network of business interests. This claim was dismissed by Gazprom Press Secretary Sergei Kupriyanov. “RosGas has nothing to do with Gazprom and does not belong to the Gazprom group,” Kupriyanov said. Shetler-Jones told New Europe that there is no evidence that there is any connection between RosGas and Gazprom. “If it is Gazprom and again we have no proof if it is Gazprom, of course this would be extremely important commercially but also politically, but I do reiterate that we have no evidence to that effect at the moment.”
Read more: http://www.neurope.eu/articles/94168.php#ixzz0b0CAm6Pe
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution Non-Commercial
